PsychologyDiscussion
 |<1-10   <<31-40Anger - Is it, or can it be, healthy?

955810Sep 12, 2007 6:38pm
The cure for cancer JUST in time for lil' ol' me?!?

I think I'd feel all honored and such....


Sponsor
DeepSixSep 12, 2007 6:39pm
I sure as hell would. So back on topic, would you say euthanasia over therapy in this case? (without the cure I mean)

I guess I'm just not understanding, we got from anger being helpful or healthy, so we're at why it isn't one over the other right?


arsham60Feb 7, 2:47am
anger is a response to stimulus and naturally occured in human , now how to control the event is important.we must be skilled to face the anger and relief of it without to hurt others.


Sponsor
KingBoyFeb 7, 4:01am
Anger plays havoc on the immune system, especially when prolonged. Paul Martin's The Sickening Mind: Brain, Behaviour, Immunity and Disease offers a good overview of psychoneuroimmunological research, with practical information on how anger, stress, fear and so on affect one's biochemistry and state of mind, each of which influences the other. Maybe getting angry can be positive when justified (there is no shortage of good examples) and constructively channelled, but throwing a hissy fit because you stubbed your toe won't get you anywhere.


arsham60Feb 7, 11:33am
I run a research about anxiety and it's effect on immune system (SIGA)during exam period in students school.and this research indicated that in high stress the immune system had been weak.


JugglingActMay 22, 2:22pm
955810 clearly communicated what I intuited on the subject. I don't think it is an action, or an emotion exactly either. I believe that it is an instinct to protect us against anything that threatens our livelihood or our values. This includes being angry with ourselves (aka moral crises) when the choices we have to choose from are a conflict of interest.

I also believe it is related to evolution, but it is only one half of the equation. It could be possible that our sense of anger is getting more refined as we need to call upon it more often for a heightened sense of awareness, judgement, and motivation. Without this red flag, we would live for the moment. But it also could be just be more apparent now than ever, as society's constraints for the expression of anger get more and more restrictive. Perhaps you are isolating the wrong variable. Is it the fact that the students ALLOWED themselves experience the stress (which is related but not the same as anger) that arose that weakened their immune sytems? Or is it that they had a feeling of stress and chose to ignore the warning that the activity was "too much" and could be damaging?

I believe it is a clash between instinct and free will causes the illness. I read an article about the tradeoff between higher intelligence and health recently, and I didn't fully grasp it until THIS MOMENT having this discussion. :)

nytimes.com/2008/05/06/science/06dumb.html [nytimes.com/2008/05/06/science/06dumb.html]


 |<1-10   <<31-40Anger - Is it, or can it be, healthy?

You need to Sign-up for StumbleUpon to post to this forum